Employer · New York

S03825 - WM of Eastern NY - Albany

Albany, NY · ~42 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

S03825 - WM of Eastern NY - Albany runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade D.

S03825 - WM of Eastern NY - Albany: 3.8 TCR = 146% of industry BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

S03825 - WM of Eastern NY - Albany safety composite

S03825 - WM of Eastern NY - Albany scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.9

2016→2024

S03825 - WM of Eastern NY - Albany injury rate improved

S03825 - WM of Eastern NY - Albany's TCR fell 17.9 from 17.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 17.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.9 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Albany, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.8 · 146% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/73
  • PHOTO Fallbrook Waste and …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fallbrook Waste and Recycling (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

S03825 - WM of Eastern NY - Albany in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows S03825 - WM of Eastern NY - Albany averages 3.8 TCR (146% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

S03825 - WM of Eastern NY - Albany TCR series: 2016=17.9 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where S03825 - WM of Eastern NY - Albany falls in its industry

2,322 industry establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 73 industry employers in New York.

S03825 - WM of Eastern NY - Albany (42 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate S03825 - WM of Eastern NY - Albany
S03825 - WM of Eastern NY - Albany (42 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

S03825 - WM of Eastern NY - Albany has fewer employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2020 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.4 0.0 1 2 0
2017 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2016 17.9 15.9 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · NY · Albany

2,322 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 391 employers in Albany, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fallbrook Waste and Recycling 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR S04050 - WM - OK City Hauling 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR S04084 - WM of Ellensburg 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alabama Dumpster 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE W D Henry & Sons Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreher Sunrise Farms LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genex Cooperative - Ithaca 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE IA Construction Management Inc. 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Albany Medical Center Hospital 6,133 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Peter's Health Partners/ St. Peter's Hospital 4,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Peter's Hospital- Albany 3,868 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Peter's Hospital-Albany-SPHP-NY 3,549 FTE
NAT-TCR S04050 - WM - OK City Hauling 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Graylyn Conference Center 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Metal Sales MC- Mocksville 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR MacDermid Offshore Solutions 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE S09353 - Johnson County Landfill 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brammer Bio Somerville 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04199 - Raleigh Hauling 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03053 - Monroe Hauling 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.