Employer · California

S09652 - Kern County Rosamond Operations

Rosamond, CA · ~22 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

S09652 - Kern County Rosamond Operations runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade D.

S09652 - Kern County Rosamond Operations: 3.9 TCR = 150% of industry BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

S09652 - Kern County Rosamond Operations safety composite

S09652 - Kern County Rosamond Operations scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

S09652 - Kern County Rosamond Operations held a steady TCR band

S09652 - Kern County Rosamond Operations's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=14.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Rosamond, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.9 · 150% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #61/247
  • PHOTO WC of E.KY Campbells…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WC of E.KY Campbellsville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

S09652 - Kern County Rosamond Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows S09652 - Kern County Rosamond Operations averages 3.9 TCR (150% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

S09652 - Kern County Rosamond Operations TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=14.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where S09652 - Kern County Rosamond Operations falls in its industry

2,322 industry establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 247 industry employers in California.

S09652 - Kern County Rosamond Operations (22 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate S09652 - Kern County Rosamond Operations
S09652 - Kern County Rosamond Operations (22 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

S09652 - Kern County Rosamond Operations has fewer employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 14.3 14.3 3 0 0
2022 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2021 5.1 5.1 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · CA · Rosamond

2,322 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 10 employers in Rosamond, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WC of E.KY Campbellsville 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Escanaba- Public Works 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR S09365 - MO ST JOSEPH HAULING 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR S05889 - Warsaw Hauling 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE LaGrande Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Del Carlo Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linda Vista Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOUNTAIN VIEW FARM SHOP 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-01337 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABS-0029-0028-01337 FAC-01337-ROSAMOND-CA 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6962-ABS 0028 1337 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR AVEP 126 MW 504 MWhr Standalone Project 22149001 36 FTE
NAT-TCR Don Wood Plumbing Company, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Stockton TX FXFE-FSX 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kls Reckitt Benckiser Mo 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Anson Construction Company, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE S03759 - WM of NM - Rio Rancho Landfill 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE S09062 - Marana Regional Landfill 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04077 - WM of CO - Durango Division 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Granulation Technology, Inc 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.