In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing · Texas

SA Scientific Ltd.

San Antonio, TX · ~94 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SA Scientific Ltd. runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

SA Scientific Ltd.: 0.6 TCR = 19% of In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SA Scientific Ltd. safety composite

SA Scientific Ltd. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2020

SA Scientific Ltd. injury rate improved

SA Scientific Ltd.'s TCR fell 0.7 from 1.9 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325413 · San Antonio, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/11
  • PHOTO Los Angeles Site
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Los Angeles Site (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

SA Scientific Ltd. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SA Scientific Ltd. averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SA Scientific Ltd. TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where SA Scientific Ltd. falls in its industry

201 In-vitro diagnostic substances establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 11 In-vitro diagnostic substances employers in Texas.

SA Scientific Ltd. (94 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate SA Scientific Ltd.
SA Scientific Ltd. (94 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4

SA Scientific Ltd. has fewer employees than the In-vitro diagnostic substances manufactu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.9 1.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325413 · TX · San Antonio

201 In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Los Angeles Site 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fujirebio Malvern 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR EnviroLogix Inc. 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms - Dalhart 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corpus Christi Electric System Ops 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE 31090 - NEUAG 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Christensen Building Group, LLC 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR 122 East 76th Street 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Carson Tahoe Minden Medical Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mirabella 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC -Huntington 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Anaheim, Public Utilities-Water and Electrical Field Operations 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Fort Lauderdale 600 Terminal Dr Ste 301 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE SFS Dulles-202IAD 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Landmark of Lancaster Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Center 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.