Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e., construction), multifamily building · California

Saarman Construction, Ltd.

Alameda, CA · ~165 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Saarman Construction, Ltd. runs at 175% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e., construction), multifamily building workplace, earning a grade D.

Saarman Construction, Ltd.: 6.6 TCR = 175% of Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e., construction), multifamily building BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Saarman Construction, Ltd. safety composite

Saarman Construction, Ltd. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2021→2024

Saarman Construction, Ltd. injury rate improved

Saarman Construction, Ltd.'s TCR fell 7.2 from 10.1 in 2021 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=10.1 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · Alameda, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 175% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #39/78
  • PHOTO 4066_7855
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~165 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4066_7855 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Saarman Construction, Ltd. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Saarman Construction, Ltd. averages 6.6 TCR (175% of the Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e., construction), multifamily building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Saarman Construction, Ltd. TCR series: 2021=10.1 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.8

Where Saarman Construction, Ltd. falls in its industry

698 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 78 Addition, alteration and renov employers in California.

Saarman Construction, Ltd. (165 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Saarman Construction, Ltd.
Saarman Construction, Ltd. (165 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Saarman Construction, Ltd. has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 0.7 4 0 0
2023 4.9 3.5 7 0 0
2022 8.6 6.6 13 0 0
2021 10.1 7.4 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · CA · Alameda

698 Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e., construction), multifamily building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 79 employers in Alameda, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4066_7855 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Residence Artists, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Think Construction Services, LLC 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Krech Exteriors, LLC 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Golden State Harvesting, Inc. 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kay Dix, Inc. 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Labor Services Inc 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE ANTIOCH SERVICE CENTER 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 626 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penumbra, Inc. 2,548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penumbra, Inc. - Alameda Campus 2,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Webcor Builders 1,688 FTE
NAT-TCR St Louis 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR EVI Services, LLC 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 2400 Orvilla Road 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Smartlam NA, LLC 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE APTIM @ Flint Hills - Pine Bend 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eventide Heartland 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE KIK Consumer Products 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enfield 165 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.