Alarm system (e.g., fire, burglar), electric, installation only · California

Sabah International Incorporated

Pleasanton, CA · ~130 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sabah International Incorporated runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Alarm system (e.g., fire, burglar), electric, installation only workplace, earning a grade B.

Sabah International Incorporated: 1.4 TCR = 52% of Alarm system (e.g., fire, burglar), electric, installation only BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sabah International Incorporated safety composite

Sabah International Incorporated scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2018→2023

Sabah International Incorporated injury rate improved

Sabah International Incorporated's TCR fell 0.8 from 0.8 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.8 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=1.7 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Pleasanton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.4 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #129/548
  • PHOTO Corona Office
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~130 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corona Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sabah International Incorporated in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sabah International Incorporated averages 1.4 TCR (52% of the Alarm system (e.g., fire, burglar), electric, installation only BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sabah International Incorporated TCR series: 2018=0.8 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=1.7 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Sabah International Incorporated falls in its industry

4,550 Alarm system (e.g., fire, burg establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #129 safest of 548 Alarm system (e.g., fire, burg employers in California.

Sabah International Incorporated (130 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sabah International Incorporated
Sabah International Incorporated (130 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Sabah International Incorporated has more employees than the Alarm system (e.g., fire, burglar), elec median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2020 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2019 3.2 2.4 4 0 0
2018 0.8 0.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · CA · Pleasanton

4,550 Alarm system (e.g., fire, burglar), electric, installation only employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 169 employers in Pleasanton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corona Office 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rancho Pacific Electric, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR James Babcock, Inc 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ace Electric Inc. Macon 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE TRCC, Inc. 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saticoy Lemon Association - Santa Paula 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sierra Land and Cattle Co LLC 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE MODESTO SERVICE CENTER 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 138 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 624 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pleasanton Campus 1,561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sciens Building Solutions LLC 1,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Exhale Atlanta 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Expeditors International of Washington Inc. - MSP 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix Mecano 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR EverGrain 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Campus 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fusion Imaging 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE CSJI-Tiffin 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Detroit - MI 130 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.