Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental · Maine

Saco Office

Saco, ME · ~47 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Saco Office runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental workplace, earning a grade C.

Saco Office: 3.5 TCR = 91% of Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Saco Office safety composite

Saco Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2016→2021

Saco Office injury rate improved

Saco Office's TCR fell 6.3 from 6.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=7.5 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Saco, ME AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 91% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/18
  • PHOTO Social Vocational Se…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Social Vocational Services 262 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

Saco Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Saco Office averages 3.5 TCR (91% of the Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Saco Office TCR series: 2016=6.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=7.5 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Saco Office falls in its industry

1,320 Companion services for disable establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 18 Companion services for disable employers in Maine.

Saco Office (47 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Saco Office
Saco Office (47 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Saco Office has fewer employees than the Companion services for disabled persons, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.5 5.0 2 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.3 2.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · ME · Saco

1,320 Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 52 employers in Saco, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Social Vocational Services 262 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACC Programs and Administration 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Portsmouth Office 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Altus Plus 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 99 - Cianbro Falmouth Office 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Portland ME 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Poland 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Senior Flexonics Pathway - Maine 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sweetser 695 FTE
CITY-NEAR MSV/Ready Seafood - Saco 312 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems 228 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08138 - Store # 8138 Saco 225 FTE
NAT-TCR Sutter Medical Foundation (185-260) 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR California Pacific Medical Center (274-CC-PAC) 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Deerfield Correctional Complex 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Continental Hydraulics, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Inskeep Ford 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Red Jacket Orchards 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutter Gould Medical Foundation (195-118) 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston (IAH) 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.