Janitorial services · California

Sacramento Airport Custodial

Sacramento, CA · ~107 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sacramento Airport Custodial runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Janitorial services workplace, earning a grade D.

Sacramento Airport Custodial: 8.3 TCR = 184% of Janitorial services BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sacramento Airport Custodial safety composite

Sacramento Airport Custodial scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2017→2022

Sacramento Airport Custodial injury rate improved

Sacramento Airport Custodial's TCR fell 5.4 from 9.8 in 2017 to 4.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.8 · 2018=14.1 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=4.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.3 · 184% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #267/368
  • PHOTO HES H Ed at Universi…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HES H Ed at University of Nevada Reno (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sacramento Airport Custodial in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sacramento Airport Custodial averages 8.3 TCR (184% of the Janitorial services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sacramento Airport Custodial TCR series: 2017=9.8 · 2018=14.1 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=4.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Sacramento Airport Custodial falls in its industry

4,064 Janitorial services establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #267 safest of 368 Janitorial services employers in California.

Sacramento Airport Custodial (107 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sacramento Airport Custodial
Sacramento Airport Custodial (107 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sacramento Airport Custodial has more employees than the Janitorial services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.4 4.4 3 0 0
2021 6.2 6.2 5 0 0
2020 7.8 6.7 7 0 0
2019 7.4 5.9 5 0 0
2018 14.1 12.1 7 0 0
2017 9.8 9.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · CA · Sacramento

4,064 Janitorial services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HES H Ed at University of Nevada Reno 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSSI / PILGRIM'S CORP - GAINESVILLE 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSSI - 0466 Frito Lay - Rosenberg 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Las Americas Premium Outlets 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Munger Bros, LLC 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Transplanting 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fondomonte California LLC - Blythe Ranch 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Coast Tomato Growers, Inc. 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR 6458-ZZAN 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Community Place 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Haven of Lakeside, LLC 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Village of Park Forest 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE LMI - Wichita - Hillside 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE AHC Millennium 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thermospas Hot Tub Products, Inc. 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE SBU-West Side Dining 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.