School bus services · California

Sacramento City Unified School District

Sacramento, CA · ~132 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sacramento City Unified School District runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical School bus services workplace, earning a grade D.

Sacramento City Unified School District: 5.5 TCR = 122% of School bus services BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sacramento City Unified School District safety composite

Sacramento City Unified School District scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sacramento City Unified School District: 0.4 → 8.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 12.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.6× in 2022

Sacramento City Unified School District's TCR rose 8.4 from 0.4 in 2019 to 8.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 12.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485410 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 122% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #59/119
  • PHOTO First Student
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 55 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: First Student (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sacramento City Unified School District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sacramento City Unified School District averages 5.5 TCR (122% of the School bus services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sacramento City Unified School District TCR series: 2019=0.4 · 2020=12.6 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=8.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Sacramento City Unified School District falls in its industry

1,574 School bus services establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 119 School bus services employers in California.

Sacramento City Unified School District (132 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sacramento City Unified School District
Sacramento City Unified School District (132 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Sacramento City Unified School District has more employees than the School bus services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.9 3.3 8 0 0
2021 0.1 0.0 11 0 0
2020 12.6 9.4 12 0 0
2019 0.4 0.3 24 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485410 · CA · Sacramento

1,574 School bus services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR First Student 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Penn Hills / Pittsburgh Terminal 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3079 CENTRAL REGION-WAUKEE IA 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR First Student 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midnight Harvest 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE JOHNSTON FARMS 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Irigoyen Farms, Inc. 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri Pointe Homes Orange County-Los Angeles 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR PHS - Kirkland Crossings 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Westminster CO 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hino Motors - South 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Park Nj Te LLC 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Complete Landsculpture texas 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Xanitos EVS at Hillcrest Medical Center 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Headquarters 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadow Lakes 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.