Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) · California

Sacramento MLS

Sacramento, CA · ~276 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sacramento MLS runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) workplace, earning a grade D.

Sacramento MLS: 5.7 TCR = 150% of Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sacramento MLS safety composite

Sacramento MLS scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2019

Sacramento MLS injury rate improved

Sacramento MLS's TCR fell 1.1 from 4.4 in 2017 to 3.2 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.4 · 2018=9.4 · 2019=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 150% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #83/141
  • PHOTO Charles River Center
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~276 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Charles River Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sacramento MLS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sacramento MLS averages 5.7 TCR (150% of the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sacramento MLS TCR series: 2017=4.4 · 2018=9.4 · 2019=3.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Sacramento MLS falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or h establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 141 Vocational rehabilitation or h employers in California.

Sacramento MLS (276 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sacramento MLS
Sacramento MLS (276 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Sacramento MLS has more employees than the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitatio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.2 1.9 5 0 0
2018 9.4 7.3 13 0 0
2017 4.4 4.0 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · CA · Sacramento

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Charles River Center 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DG Woodhaven 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 402 Jefferson Road 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodwill Crystal Lake 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hydraflow 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schneider Electric CMF 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA Millwork - Mission Bell, LLC 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michael Cadillac, Inc. 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Coffee Correctional 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeast Ohio 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Loyal Termite and Pest Control Company, Inc 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Walnut Hill School for the Art 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE FRMNMAAA 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newark Liberty International Airport Marriott 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE HERO Logistics (Plant) 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE Linwood FBG 276 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.