Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network · Texas

Safe Delivery Guys

Houston, TX · ~88 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Safe Delivery Guys runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network workplace, earning a grade D.

Safe Delivery Guys: 12.0 TCR = 184% of Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Safe Delivery Guys safety composite

Safe Delivery Guys scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
D 7.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2022→2024

Safe Delivery Guys injury rate improved

Safe Delivery Guys's TCR fell 7.1 from 14.6 in 2022 to 7.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=14.6 · 2023=13.7 · 2024=7.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 12.0 · 184% of ind

  • DART 7.6 DART
  • RANK #357/463
  • PHOTO CODEN - COMMERCE CITY
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CODEN - COMMERCE CITY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Safe Delivery Guys in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Safe Delivery Guys averages 12.0 TCR (184% of the Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Safe Delivery Guys TCR series: 2022=14.6 · 2023=13.7 · 2024=7.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Safe Delivery Guys falls in its industry

6,679 Local letter and parcel delive establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #357 safest of 463 Local letter and parcel delive employers in Texas.

Safe Delivery Guys (88 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Safe Delivery Guys
Safe Delivery Guys (88 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Safe Delivery Guys has fewer employees than the Local letter and parcel delivery service median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.6 7.6 6 0 0
2023 13.7 12.0 8 0 0
2022 14.6 13.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · TX · Houston

6,679 Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CODEN - COMMERCE CITY 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 17855 JFK BLVD 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 3401 COMMONWEALTH BOULEVARD 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Xtreme Express LLC 12.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE F AND B HOLDINGS LLC DBA LONE STAR CITRUS GROWERS 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Puirty Texas 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Falcon Energy Services 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : Sandy Creek 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Blue Bucket Group LLC - 509truk-Helpers 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AAA Club Alliance New Castle DE 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cambridge Medical Center 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fusion Babbitting Company, Inc 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Groveport - 6290 Opus Drive 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ciocca Corvette of Atlantic City 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Agile Logistics LLC 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zipster Delivery Service LLC 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.