Textile broadwoven fabrics mills · South Carolina

Safety Components Fabric Technologies Inc

Greenville, SC · ~203 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Safety Components Fabric Technologies Inc runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Textile broadwoven fabrics mills workplace, earning a grade B.

Safety Components Fabric Technologies Inc: 2.6 TCR = 79% of Textile broadwoven fabrics mills BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Safety Components Fabric Technologies Inc safety composite

Safety Components Fabric Technologies Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Safety Components Fabric Technologies Inc held a steady TCR band

Safety Components Fabric Technologies Inc's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.9 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 313210 · Greenville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/29
  • PHOTO Crypton Mills
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~203 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crypton Mills (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Safety Components Fabric Technologies Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Safety Components Fabric Technologies Inc averages 2.6 TCR (79% of the Textile broadwoven fabrics mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Safety Components Fabric Technologies Inc TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Safety Components Fabric Technologies Inc falls in its industry

141 Textile broadwoven fabrics mil establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 29 Textile broadwoven fabrics mil employers in South Carolina.

Safety Components Fabric Technologies Inc (203 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 136 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Safety Components Fabric Technologies Inc
Safety Components Fabric Technologies Inc (203 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 136 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Safety Components Fabric Technologies Inc has more employees than the Textile broadwoven fabrics mills median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.7 0.0 6 0 0
2017 2.2 0.9 5 0 0
2016 2.9 1.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

313210 · SC · Greenville

141 Textile broadwoven fabrics mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crypton Mills 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tencate Geosynthetics - Cornelia 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lovelady Plant 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tencate Geosynthetics - Pendergrass 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zeus Sales/R&D/AMP Facility 203 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 208 203 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 6353 203 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Cayce 203 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Anvil Attachments 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Moser's Foods #2 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mizpah Healthcare Group LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Leicht Transfer & Storage - Donald 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arthur CUSD #305 203 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atrium Post Acute Care of Matawan 203 FTE
NAT-SIZE Republic National Distributing Company 15 203 FTE
NAT-SIZE Washington Marriott at Metro Center 203 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.