Casino hotels · Michigan

Saganing Eagles Landing Casino

Standish, MI · ~381 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Saganing Eagles Landing Casino runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Casino hotels workplace, earning a grade D.

Saganing Eagles Landing Casino: 4.3 TCR = 142% of Casino hotels BLS 3.0 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Saganing Eagles Landing Casino safety composite

Saganing Eagles Landing Casino scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Saganing Eagles Landing Casino held a steady TCR band

Saganing Eagles Landing Casino's TCR held near 0.1 from 5.1 in 2016 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.1 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721120 · Standish, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 142% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO New York New York Ho…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 127 inj
  • SIZE ~381 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New York New York Hotel and Casino (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Saganing Eagles Landing Casino in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Saganing Eagles Landing Casino averages 4.3 TCR (142% of the Casino hotels BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Saganing Eagles Landing Casino TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=5 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 3.0

Where Saganing Eagles Landing Casino falls in its industry

381 Casino hotels establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 Casino hotels employers in Michigan.

Saganing Eagles Landing Casino (381 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 725 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Saganing Eagles Landing Casino
Saganing Eagles Landing Casino (381 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 725 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Saganing Eagles Landing Casino has fewer employees than the Casino hotels median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 4.5 20 0 0
2023 3.1 2.9 12 0 0
2022 5.5 4.7 20 0 0
2021 5.8 4.9 17 3 0
2020 5.0 4.0 19 0 0
2019 3.6 2.4 12 0 0
2018 2.2 1.1 6 0 0
2017 2.5 2.2 7 0 0
2016 5.1 3.7 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721120 · MI · Standish

381 Casino hotels employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 27 employers in Standish, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New York New York Hotel and Casino 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TROPICANA LAUGHLIN HOTEL & CASINO 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 500 Entertainment 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ho-Chunk Gaming - Wisconsin Dells 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Arconic Whitehall Operations - Whitehall Plant 5 381 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paslin 381 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Transport GO - Stephens 381 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Water Authority - Water Resource Recovery Facility 380 FTE
CITY-NEAR FORWARD CORPORATION 859 FTE
CITY-NEAR PRA Vantage 210 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MISAG23 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magline 142 FTE
NAT-TCR Sanders Machine 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Packing Co, Inc 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NEI General Contracting, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Playa Largo Resort and Spa 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harmac Medical Products Inc. 381 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sheraton Maui 381 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ardagh Glass Inc Dunkirk 381 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sauk Prairie Healthcare - Hospital Campus 381 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.