Chemical stoneware (i.e., pottery products) manufacturing · Tennessee

Saint-Gobain NorPro Soddy Daisy, TN Site

Soddy Daisy, TN · ~30 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Saint-Gobain NorPro Soddy Daisy, TN Site runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Chemical stoneware (i.e., pottery products) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Saint-Gobain NorPro Soddy Daisy, TN Site: 1.5 TCR = 45% of Chemical stoneware (i.e., pottery products) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Saint-Gobain NorPro Soddy Daisy, TN Site safety composite

Saint-Gobain NorPro Soddy Daisy, TN Site scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

Saint-Gobain NorPro Soddy Daisy, TN Site injury rate improved

Saint-Gobain NorPro Soddy Daisy, TN Site's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327110 · Soddy Daisy, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 45% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P80
  • PHOTO Mayco Colors
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mayco Colors (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Saint-Gobain NorPro Soddy Daisy, TN Site in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Saint-Gobain NorPro Soddy Daisy, TN Site averages 1.5 TCR (45% of the Chemical stoneware (i.e., pottery products) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Saint-Gobain NorPro Soddy Daisy, TN Site TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Saint-Gobain NorPro Soddy Daisy, TN Site falls in its industry

109 Chemical stoneware (i.e., pott establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Saint-Gobain NorPro Soddy Daisy, TN Site (30 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Saint-Gobain NorPro Soddy Daisy, TN Site
Saint-Gobain NorPro Soddy Daisy, TN Site (30 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Saint-Gobain NorPro Soddy Daisy, TN Site has fewer employees than the Chemical stoneware (i.e., pottery produc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.6 2.6 0 1 0
2018 2.7 2.7 0 1 0
2017 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.4 2.4 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327110 · TN · Soddy Daisy

109 Chemical stoneware (i.e., pottery products) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 15 employers in Soddy Daisy, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mayco Colors 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR M Cubed Technologies, Inc 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Table Mountain 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toto USA Lakewood 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waynes Knoxville 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cornerstone Restoration Services, LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE W.E. O'Neil Construction Co. of Tennessee 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE KCS 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primary Care Soddy Daisy 6,606 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 477 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR 477 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sequoyah Nuclear Plant 231 FTE
NAT-TCR Pritchard Industries, LLC. - NJ 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR GeoTech 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR USA FL Orlando Plant 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Reliatrace, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nutrition Services Kitchen 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE SiteOne Landscape Supply #183 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4283 42F2 42N Enterprise Leasing Company of Florida, LLC, Tampa Division 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iowa Laborers 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.