Highway Repair, maintenance · Virginia

Salem District Bridge Crews

Salem, VA · ~36 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Salem District Bridge Crews runs at 278% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Highway Repair, maintenance workplace, earning a grade F.

Salem District Bridge Crews: 7.8 TCR = 278% of Highway Repair, maintenance BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Salem District Bridge Crews safety composite

Salem District Bridge Crews scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2017→2023

Salem District Bridge Crews injury rate improved

Salem District Bridge Crews's TCR fell 1.9 from 8.8 in 2017 to 6.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.8 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=9.5 · 2022=12.9 · 2023=6.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Salem, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 278% of ind

  • DART 6.9 DART
  • RANK #117/141
  • PHOTO Folsom
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Folsom (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Salem District Bridge Crews in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Salem District Bridge Crews averages 7.8 TCR (278% of the Highway Repair, maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Salem District Bridge Crews TCR series: 2017=8.8 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=9.5 · 2022=12.9 · 2023=6.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Salem District Bridge Crews falls in its industry

4,078 Highway Repair, maintenance establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #117 safest of 141 Highway Repair, maintenance employers in Virginia.

Salem District Bridge Crews (36 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Salem District Bridge Crews
Salem District Bridge Crews (36 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Salem District Bridge Crews has fewer employees than the Highway Repair, maintenance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.9 6.9 2 0 0
2022 12.9 9.6 4 0 0
2021 9.5 9.5 3 0 0
2020 6.7 3.4 2 0 0
2019 6.8 6.8 2 0 0
2018 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2017 8.8 5.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · VA · Salem

4,078 Highway Repair, maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 134 employers in Salem, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Folsom 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Hamden - Public Works 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acme Concrete Paving, Inc. 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Region 5- Baker City 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE YORKTOWN PW ST 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Richmond Warehouse 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fieldale Ofc 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Virginia American Water - Hopewell District 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carter Machinery Company, Inc. 2,763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lewis Gale Medical Center 1,159 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yokohama Tire Manufacturing Virginia, LLC 770 FTE
CITY-NEAR LewisGale Medical Center 690 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1391 Raynham Center, MA 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR NS Flexibles LLC dba St Johns Packaging 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Seating 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Hospice of Baton Rouge 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Five Star Residences of Lafayette #46048 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mariposa Landscapes Inc - Gardena 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5EF Travelers Choice Travelware 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Concrete Sawing Inc. 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.