Natural Gas Distribution · North Carolina

Salisbury Resource Center - PNG

Salisbury, NC · ~25 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Salisbury Resource Center - PNG runs at 195% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Natural Gas Distribution workplace, earning a grade D.

Salisbury Resource Center - PNG: 2.3 TCR = 195% of Natural Gas Distribution BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Salisbury Resource Center - PNG safety composite

Salisbury Resource Center - PNG scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2017→2023

Salisbury Resource Center - PNG injury rate improved

Salisbury Resource Center - PNG's TCR fell 7.4 from 7.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.4 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221210 · Salisbury, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.3 · 195% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/46
  • PHOTO Bellingham District …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bellingham District Office-Conservation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Salisbury Resource Center - PNG in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Salisbury Resource Center - PNG averages 2.3 TCR (195% of the Natural Gas Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Salisbury Resource Center - PNG TCR series: 2017=7.4 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Salisbury Resource Center - PNG falls in its industry

1,153 Natural Gas Distribution establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 46 Natural Gas Distribution employers in North Carolina.

Salisbury Resource Center - PNG (25 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Salisbury Resource Center - PNG
Salisbury Resource Center - PNG (25 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Salisbury Resource Center - PNG has fewer employees than the Natural Gas Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.7 3.3 2 0 0
2017 7.4 3.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221210 · NC · Salisbury

1,153 Natural Gas Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 180 employers in Salisbury, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bellingham District Office-Conservation 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monett 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CenterPoint Energy - Texas City 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Utilities Charles Street 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fair View Nursery, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE John William Carter III 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hill of Berry's 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andrew Tyson Farms 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSCEXC 1,314 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Rowan Medical Center 1,176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rowan County Government 1,151 FTE
CITY-NEAR CLT1 973 FTE
NAT-TCR Stavo Industries 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR MRC Global -172 La Porte, TX (RDC) 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Roedel Partners of Nashua, LLC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Jordan Ford Ltd. 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Titan Contracting LLC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE NFI Interactive Logistics LLC-650 Berry Rd 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Besse Lumber Company 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Groendyke Transport - Baton Rouge 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.