General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Truckload · Utah

Salt Lake City Terminal

Salt Lake City, UT · ~2,766 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Salt Lake City Terminal runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Truckload workplace, earning a grade A.

Salt Lake City Terminal: 1.6 TCR = 35% of General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Truckload BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Salt Lake City Terminal safety composite

Salt Lake City Terminal scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Salt Lake City Terminal held a steady TCR band

Salt Lake City Terminal's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.3 in 2017 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.3 · 2018=1.0 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=1.8 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Salt Lake City, UT AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #6/36
  • PHOTO Fowler, CA - East Ma…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 509 inj
  • SIZE ~2,766 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fowler, CA - East Manning Ave (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Salt Lake City Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Salt Lake City Terminal averages 1.6 TCR (35% of the General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Truckload BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Salt Lake City Terminal TCR series: 2017=1.3 · 2018=1 · 2019=3 · 2020=1.8 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Salt Lake City Terminal falls in its industry

3,252 General Freight Trucking Long establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 36 General Freight Trucking Long employers in Utah.

Salt Lake City Terminal (2,766 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Salt Lake City Terminal
Salt Lake City Terminal (2,766 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Salt Lake City Terminal has more employees than the General Freight Trucking Long-Distance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.8 25 0 0
2023 1.4 0.9 30 0 0
2022 1.3 0.9 41 0 0
2020 1.8 1.1 66 0 0
2019 3.0 1.7 159 0 0
2018 1.0 0.6 92 0 0
2017 1.3 0.7 96 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · UT · Salt Lake City

3,252 General Freight Trucking Long-Distance Truckload employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fowler, CA - East Manning Ave 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schulz Transportation Services, Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LAX LTL 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR S&J Potashnick Trans., Inc 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dixie Regional Medical Center RR 2,793 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. George Regional Hospital 2,807 FTE
STATE-SIZE UTLKE - UTAH REGIONAL HUB 2,684 FTE
STATE-SIZE McKay Dee Hospital 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3Harris 2,577 FTE
NAT-TCR Pilot Plant 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Master Interiors, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR UC Santa Barbara 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Westview Services - Glendale 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pfizer New York 2,765 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4701-RRD 2,767 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lordstown Complex 2,768 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Dew2 2,770 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.