Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Arizona

Salt River Project Coronado Generating Station

St Johns, AZ · ~173 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Salt River Project Coronado Generating Station runs at 258% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

Salt River Project Coronado Generating Station: 3.1 TCR = 258% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Salt River Project Coronado Generating Station safety composite

Salt River Project Coronado Generating Station scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Salt River Project Coronado Generating Station: 1.5 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.03× in 2022

Salt River Project Coronado Generating Station's TCR rose 3.0 from 1.5 in 2019 to 4.5 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · St Johns, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.1 · 258% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #12/13
  • PHOTO KCP&L - Sedalia Serv…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KCP&L - Sedalia Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Salt River Project Coronado Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Salt River Project Coronado Generating Station averages 3.1 TCR (258% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Salt River Project Coronado Generating Station TCR series: 2019=1.5 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=4.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Salt River Project Coronado Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 13 Electric power generation, fos employers in Arizona.

Salt River Project Coronado Generating Station (173 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Salt River Project Coronado Generating Station
Salt River Project Coronado Generating Station (173 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Salt River Project Coronado Generating Station has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.5 3.2 7 0 0
2021 3.3 3.3 3 2 0
2019 1.5 1.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · AZ · St Johns

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KCP&L - Sedalia Service Center 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR KCP&L - F&M Metering Services 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rainbow Energy Center 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Owensboro Municipal Utilities 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sun Streams 4 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE SDB, Inc. Intel Ocotillo, Chandler 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edison Power Constructors 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walters and Wolf Construction Specialties 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coronado Generating Station 211 FTE
NAT-TCR Yukon Mfg. Corp. - a div. of Nor-Tech Industrial Corp. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Henderson 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Garden Club 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Transportation 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZANO 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZELM 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZHRL 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jimmy Evans Company 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.