Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers · South Carolina

Sam Carbis Solutions Darlington

Darlington, SC · ~82 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sam Carbis Solutions Darlington runs at 212% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Sam Carbis Solutions Darlington: 4.7 TCR = 212% of Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sam Carbis Solutions Darlington safety composite

Sam Carbis Solutions Darlington scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2017→2020

Sam Carbis Solutions Darlington injury rate improved

Sam Carbis Solutions Darlington's TCR fell 6.7 from 8.6 in 2017 to 1.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.6 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423830 · Darlington, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.7 · 212% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/15
  • PHOTO NorthWest Handling S…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NorthWest Handling Systems - Renton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Sam Carbis Solutions Darlington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sam Carbis Solutions Darlington averages 4.7 TCR (212% of the Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sam Carbis Solutions Darlington TCR series: 2017=8.6 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=1.9 · BLS 2.2

Where Sam Carbis Solutions Darlington falls in its industry

911 Industrial machinery and equip establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 15 Industrial machinery and equip employers in South Carolina.

Sam Carbis Solutions Darlington (82 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Sam Carbis Solutions Darlington
Sam Carbis Solutions Darlington (82 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Sam Carbis Solutions Darlington has more employees than the Industrial machinery and equipment (exce median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 4.5 4.5 5 0 0
2018 3.7 1.9 3 1 0
2017 8.6 3.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423830 · SC · Darlington

911 Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 38 employers in Darlington, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NorthWest Handling Systems - Renton 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR US TX Midland 2825 East I-20 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR WISCONSIN BOX 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gosiger Machine Tools, LLC, Plymouth, MI 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE NNOB VCSN UNITS 1 2 3 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steel Clad, Inc. 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE IG Design Group Americas, Inc. - Leesville, SC 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morcon Tissue - SC 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nucor Steel South Carolina (Darlington) 480 FTE
CITY-NEAR Darlington County 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC264 Darlington (Dixie) 461 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7188 239 FTE
NAT-TCR Indy W. 86th St. Thrift Store 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sxb 20 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Penn Line Corporation - Tree Division 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NDP 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE San Juan Center 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE ControlTech Automation - STL 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross store 313 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Polk Power Station 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.