Materials recovery facilities (MRF) · North Carolina

Samsung

Charlotte, NC · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Samsung runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Materials recovery facilities (MRF) workplace, earning a grade C.

Samsung: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Samsung safety composite

Samsung scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Samsung held a steady TCR band

Samsung's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.0 TCR.

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562920 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/13
  • PHOTO S09107 - Garland MRF
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S09107 - Garland MRF (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Samsung in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Samsung averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Samsung TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Samsung falls in its industry

422 Materials recovery facilities establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 13 Materials recovery facilities employers in North Carolina.

Samsung (47 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Samsung
Samsung (47 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Samsung has more employees than the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562920 · NC · Charlotte

422 Materials recovery facilities (MRF) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S09107 - Garland MRF 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NY191 Harmon New York Administrative Office 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR S08605 - SMaRT 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR S05731 - Salt Lake MRF 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monroe NC Operations 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan River Steam Station 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hickory Resource Center PNG 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smith Douglas Charlotte 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 052743-Fol-El Dorado Hills Sta 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE 086834-Seymour Po 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE DRB Group - Pittsburgh 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gateway Services Group 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.