General warehousing and storage · Texas

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Ft. Worth

Fort Worth, TX · ~118 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Ft. Worth runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Ft. Worth: 1.2 TCR = 20% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Ft. Worth safety composite

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Ft. Worth scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2022→2024

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Ft. Worth injury rate improved

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Ft. Worth's TCR fell 3.5 from 3.5 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #147/846
  • PHOTO Katoen Natie Norfolk
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Katoen Natie Norfolk (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Ft. Worth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Ft. Worth averages 1.2 TCR (20% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Ft. Worth TCR series: 2022=3.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Ft. Worth falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #147 safest of 846 General warehousing and storag employers in Texas.

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Ft. Worth (118 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Ft. Worth
Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Ft. Worth (118 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Ft. Worth has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · Fort Worth

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Katoen Natie Norfolk 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlantic Tire - Store 84 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR WI03 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR H.G. Georgia Merchants, LLC 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village farms Marfa 2 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pintail Alternative Energy, LLC 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oncor West DOC 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE TYLER SC&TRANS 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Wisconsin Utility Exposure, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Container Corporation 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR D.R. Horton, Inc. - East Florida (Palm Bay) 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR D.R. Horton, Inc. - Bay Area 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE AC Foundry Incorporated dba Melling Engineered Aluminum Castings 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hamilton Parker Company, LLC 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Insulations, LLC. New Orleans 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Galeon 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.