General warehousing and storage · Pennsylvania

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Hazleton

Hazleton, PA · ~113 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Hazleton runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade C.

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Hazleton: 6.1 TCR = 105% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Hazleton safety composite

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Hazleton scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2022→2024

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Hazleton injury rate improved

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Hazleton's TCR fell 3.6 from 6.2 in 2022 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=6.2 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Hazleton, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.1 · 105% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #466/650
  • PHOTO 5120 VAN BUREN RDC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 5120 VAN BUREN RDC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Hazleton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Hazleton averages 6.1 TCR (105% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Hazleton TCR series: 2022=6.2 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 5.8

Where Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Hazleton falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #466 safest of 650 General warehousing and storag employers in Pennsylvania.

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Hazleton (113 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Hazleton
Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Hazleton (113 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Samsung SDS America, Inc. - Hazleton has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 1.7 3 0 0
2023 9.6 7.0 15 0 0
2022 6.2 6.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · PA · Hazleton

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 79 employers in Hazleton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 5120 VAN BUREN RDC 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 985751 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eclipse Advantage - NDSEBMA - east Bridgewater, MA 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMZL : DRC1 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Constellation Power Labs 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE FARMER BOY AG INC 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Conway Phillips Holding, LLC 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - AVP1 2,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR Case Ready Hazleton PA 872 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lehigh Valley Hospital - Hazleton 796 FTE
CITY-NEAR LVH-Hazleton 722 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1302 - W Deptford PDQ Ph 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Chandler Exhibits, Inc. AFTON 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Telescents, Inc. DBA Fragrancenet Austell Warehouse 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ring Container Jefferson 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0075 - Houston Westchase 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE 9743 - Silicon Valley Office 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joy Global Underground Mining LLC. 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schaendorf Custom Farming 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.