Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · Georgia

Samuel Packaging Systems Group

Cartersville, GA · ~72 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Samuel Packaging Systems Group runs at 225% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Samuel Packaging Systems Group: 7.4 TCR = 225% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Samuel Packaging Systems Group safety composite

Samuel Packaging Systems Group scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Samuel Packaging Systems Group: 2.0 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 16.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Samuel Packaging Systems Group's TCR rose 1.9 from 2.0 in 2018 to 4.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 16.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Cartersville, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.4 · 225% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #88/103
  • PHOTO Molded Fiber Glass C…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Molded Fiber Glass Companies/Texas LP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Samuel Packaging Systems Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Samuel Packaging Systems Group averages 7.4 TCR (225% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Samuel Packaging Systems Group TCR series: 2018=2 · 2019=16.3 · 2021=4 · BLS 3.3

Where Samuel Packaging Systems Group falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #88 safest of 103 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in Georgia.

Samuel Packaging Systems Group (72 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Samuel Packaging Systems Group
Samuel Packaging Systems Group (72 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Samuel Packaging Systems Group has fewer employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.0 0.0 3 0 0
2019 16.3 10.2 8 0 0
2018 2.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · GA · Cartersville

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 145 employers in Cartersville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Molded Fiber Glass Companies/Texas LP 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henagar 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Splendor Boats 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR KW Plastics Container Chicago Heights 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pond Constructors, Inc. 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Shallowford Operating - 4404 North Shallowford Rd. 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brunswick Operating and Transmission Maintenance Center 3951 and 3915 Community Rd 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida City Gas 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant 15/1G 1,365 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant 15 1,294 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Cartersville Medical Center 643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cartersville Brewery 527 FTE
NAT-TCR Milan Mi 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR OC Parks - South Coastal Operations 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ennis-Flint Salem, OR 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 48 Ridgecrest 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heartis Clear Lake 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Windsor Locks 4 Schoephoester Rd 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Salt Lake City 656 N 3800 W 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4765-MSYCX0745 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.