Data processing services (except payroll services, financial transaction processing services) · Texas

San Antonio - DATAMARK, Inc.

San Antonio, TX · ~162 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

San Antonio - DATAMARK, Inc. runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Data processing services (except payroll services, financial transaction processing services) workplace, earning a grade C.

San Antonio - DATAMARK, Inc.: 0.6 TCR = 89% of Data processing services (except payroll services, financial transaction processing services) BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

San Antonio - DATAMARK, Inc. safety composite

San Antonio - DATAMARK, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

San Antonio - DATAMARK, Inc. held a steady TCR band

San Antonio - DATAMARK, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.1 from 0.6 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.6 · 2017=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 518210 · San Antonio, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.6 · 89% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #11/15
  • PHOTO Location 42015
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~162 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Location 42015 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

San Antonio - DATAMARK, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows San Antonio - DATAMARK, Inc. averages 0.6 TCR (89% of the Data processing services (except payroll services, financial transaction processing services) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

San Antonio - DATAMARK, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=0.7 · BLS 0.7

Where San Antonio - DATAMARK, Inc. falls in its industry

180 Data processing services (exce establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 15 Data processing services (exce employers in Texas.

San Antonio - DATAMARK, Inc. (162 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 182 employees and a TCR of 0.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate San Antonio - DATAMARK, Inc.
San Antonio - DATAMARK, Inc. (162 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 182 employees and a TCR of 0.6

San Antonio - DATAMARK, Inc. has fewer employees than the Data processing services (except payroll median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2016 0.6 0.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

518210 · TX · San Antonio

180 Data processing services (except payroll services, financial transaction processing services) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Location 42015 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 311 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Uber Technologies, Inc.-Austin Office 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LOCATION 33001 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE BCEI Houston Office 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE HMT LLC - Baytown 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electra Link, Inc. Spring 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE D&L Electric Company, Inc. 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR 06- Knoxville, TN 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR H5 - Garden City 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodrich - Cargo Systems 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Division #35 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wall Street 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE JFSNA at ExxonMobil Complex Baton Rouge 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Drake-Williams Steel 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE BioScrip Infusion Services - Morris Plains - 2300 162 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.