Electrical signs manufacturing · California

San Diego Electric Sign, Inc.

El Cajon, CA · ~20 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

San Diego Electric Sign, Inc. runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electrical signs manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

San Diego Electric Sign, Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Electrical signs manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

San Diego Electric Sign, Inc. safety composite

San Diego Electric Sign, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2024

San Diego Electric Sign, Inc. injury rate improved

San Diego Electric Sign, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.0 from 5.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=4.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339950 · El Cajon, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/26
  • PHOTO Advance Sign Group
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Advance Sign Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

San Diego Electric Sign, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows San Diego Electric Sign, Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Electrical signs manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

San Diego Electric Sign, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=4.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where San Diego Electric Sign, Inc. falls in its industry

405 Electrical signs manufacturing establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 26 Electrical signs manufacturing employers in California.

San Diego Electric Sign, Inc. (20 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate San Diego Electric Sign, Inc.
San Diego Electric Sign, Inc. (20 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5

San Diego Electric Sign, Inc. has fewer employees than the Electrical signs manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.3 6.3 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.9 0.0 1 0 0
2016 5.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339950 · CA · El Cajon

405 Electrical signs manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 236 employers in El Cajon, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Advance Sign Group 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SIGN LITE 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Czarnowski-Dallas 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Star Exhibits 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sills Farms, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE F A Maggiore & Sons, LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE CALMEX CONTRACTING INC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Velvet Antler Ranch LLC 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR SOUTHERN REGION : SDU 1,176 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 370 1,148 FTE
CITY-NEAR GKN Aerospace Chem-tronics 1,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR GKN Aerospace Chem Tronics 938 FTE
NAT-TCR Logistec USA / Cleveland Breakbulk 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SSP-SiMatrix, Inc. - Victor 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AustinWoods 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Myers Pest Control, Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 177-Hampton Inn Anchorage 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE New River Building Supply Banner Elk 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westwoods Golf Course Administration 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gustafson Logging Co. 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.