Community meals, social services · California

San Joaquin County Human Services Agency-Aging

Stockton, CA · ~75 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

San Joaquin County Human Services Agency-Aging runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Community meals, social services workplace, earning a grade A.

San Joaquin County Human Services Agency-Aging: 1.5 TCR = 41% of Community meals, social services BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

San Joaquin County Human Services Agency-Aging safety composite

San Joaquin County Human Services Agency-Aging scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2021→2022

San Joaquin County Human Services Agency-Aging injury rate improved

San Joaquin County Human Services Agency-Aging's TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=3.1 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624210 · Stockton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/19
  • PHOTO Akron-Canton Regiona…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Akron-Canton Regional Foodbank Canton Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

San Joaquin County Human Services Agency-Aging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows San Joaquin County Human Services Agency-Aging averages 1.5 TCR (41% of the Community meals, social services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

San Joaquin County Human Services Agency-Aging TCR series: 2021=3.1 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where San Joaquin County Human Services Agency-Aging falls in its industry

147 Community meals, social servic establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 19 Community meals, social servic employers in California.

San Joaquin County Human Services Agency-Aging (75 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate San Joaquin County Human Services Agency-Aging
San Joaquin County Human Services Agency-Aging (75 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.7

San Joaquin County Human Services Agency-Aging has more employees than the Community meals, social services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.1 3.1 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624210 · CA · Stockton

147 Community meals, social services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 605 employers in Stockton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Akron-Canton Regional Foodbank Canton Campus 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Philabundance 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Connections for the Homeless 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Personal Trainer Food 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunset Farms, Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Martinelli Vineyard Managment, Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESTVIEW BERRY FARMS 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE DJRAS CORP DBA PRIME HARVEST CONTRACTING 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaSalette Care and Rehabilitation Center 5,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCKCX0ABX SCK - ABX 4,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-18 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CA Health Care Facility 3,227 FTE
NAT-TCR FUJIFILM Manufacturing USA Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Flying A Pumping Services LLC, 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 4371 North Tonawanda Container 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1927 VGS - Fenton, MI FF, LLC #38-2750461 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE G&J Pepsi- Athens 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG069 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neumeier Engineering, Inc 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE London Terrace 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.