Industrial supplies, disposable plastics, paper, merchant wholesalers · California

San Joaquin Supply

Fresno, CA · ~37 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

San Joaquin Supply runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial supplies, disposable plastics, paper, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

San Joaquin Supply: 0.9 TCR = 41% of Industrial supplies, disposable plastics, paper, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

San Joaquin Supply safety composite

San Joaquin Supply scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2018→2023

San Joaquin Supply injury rate improved

San Joaquin Supply's TCR fell 2.8 from 2.8 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424130 · Fresno, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/30
  • PHOTO Veritiv Operating Co…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Veritiv Operating Company - FL326 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

San Joaquin Supply in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows San Joaquin Supply averages 0.9 TCR (41% of the Industrial supplies, disposable plastics, paper, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

San Joaquin Supply TCR series: 2018=2.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where San Joaquin Supply falls in its industry

290 Industrial supplies, disposabl establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 30 Industrial supplies, disposabl employers in California.

San Joaquin Supply (37 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate San Joaquin Supply
San Joaquin Supply (37 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.9

San Joaquin Supply has fewer employees than the Industrial supplies, disposable plastics median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.8 2.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424130 · CA · Fresno

290 Industrial supplies, disposable plastics, paper, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Veritiv Operating Company - FL326 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SupplyOne Cleveland, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bunzl Midatlantic, LLC (DBA Bunzl Buffalo) 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Veritiv Operating Company - NY051 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE KP Spraying LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN - 01 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kimberlina Shop 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR D.R. Horton, Inc. - Chattanooga 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest- West Allis 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 10424 Tenaya (WO) 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 108 Ind - Landisville 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE LMA/LCS Willingboro-1113 Hospital Drive 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sparks Industrial Service, LLC 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northview Bank 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Mint Hill-Fire Department 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.