Engines, internal combustion (except aircraft, automotive), merchant wholesalers · California

San Leandro

San Leandro, CA · ~270 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

San Leandro runs at 202% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Engines, internal combustion (except aircraft, automotive), merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

San Leandro: 4.4 TCR = 202% of Engines, internal combustion (except aircraft, automotive), merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

San Leandro safety composite

San Leandro scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.1

2016→2024

San Leandro injury rate improved

San Leandro's TCR fell 6.1 from 6.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.1 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423830 · San Leandro, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.4 · 202% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #39/58
  • PHOTO Joseph Industries
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 133 inj
  • SIZE ~270 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Joseph Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

San Leandro in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows San Leandro averages 4.4 TCR (202% of the Engines, internal combustion (except aircraft, automotive), merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

San Leandro TCR series: 2016=6.1 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where San Leandro falls in its industry

911 Engines, internal combustion ( establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 58 Engines, internal combustion ( employers in California.

San Leandro (270 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate San Leandro
San Leandro (270 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

San Leandro has more employees than the Engines, internal combustion (except air median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2022 6.3 6.3 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.5 6.1 31 4 0
2019 6.7 5.6 36 1 0
2018 4.2 4.1 24 1 0
2017 7.3 7.3 22 0 0
2016 6.1 1.1 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423830 · CA · San Leandro

911 Engines, internal combustion (except aircraft, automotive), merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 227 employers in San Leandro, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Joseph Industries 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dana Kepner Company LLC 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Air Center of Florida 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR US TX Odessa 3209 West County Road 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dragados-USA 270 FTE
STATE-SIZE R & R Framing, Inc. 270 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barnum & Celillo Electric Inc. 270 FTE
STATE-SIZE SMC Ltd. 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 475 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 571 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120451 2,079 FTE
CITY-NEAR 02820451 SAN LEANDRO MEDICAL CENTER 1,763 FTE
NAT-TCR Vcf 170 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hendrick Screen Company 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR East Kansas City MO FXFE-EKC 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Indianapolis Shop IN FXFE-INDS 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE DESTINY 270 FTE
NAT-SIZE Archer Rehabilitation, LLC (d/b/a UF Health Rehab Hospital) 270 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hwy 20 270 FTE
NAT-SIZE Masters Gallery Foods, Inc - Oostburg 270 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.