Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system · California

San Vicente - Public Utilities

Lakeside, CA · ~37 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

San Vicente - Public Utilities runs at 1002% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade F.

San Vicente - Public Utilities: 12.0 TCR = 1002% of Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

San Vicente - Public Utilities safety composite

San Vicente - Public Utilities scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

San Vicente - Public Utilities: 8.2 → 11.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 16.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.96× in 2024

San Vicente - Public Utilities's TCR rose 3.3 from 8.2 in 2022 to 11.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 16.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Lakeside, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.0 · 1002% of ind

  • DART 11.5 DART
  • RANK #68/74
  • PHOTO Egan Water Reclamati…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Egan Water Reclamation Plant (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

San Vicente - Public Utilities in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows San Vicente - Public Utilities averages 12.0 TCR (1002% of the Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

San Vicente - Public Utilities TCR series: 2022=8.2 · 2023=16.4 · 2024=11.5 · BLS 1.2

Where San Vicente - Public Utilities falls in its industry

400 Waste collection, treatment, a establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #68 safest of 74 Waste collection, treatment, a employers in California.

San Vicente - Public Utilities (37 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate San Vicente - Public Utilities
San Vicente - Public Utilities (37 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

San Vicente - Public Utilities has fewer employees than the Waste collection, treatment, and disposa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.5 11.5 4 0 0
2023 16.4 16.4 5 1 0
2022 8.2 8.2 1 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · CA · Lakeside

400 Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 55 employers in Lakeside, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Egan Water Reclamation Plant 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Brewster 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Iowa Missouri 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FRWRD-ADP 12.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE KP Spraying LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN - 01 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kimberlina Shop 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barona Resort & Casino 2,751 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAKESIDE CA (SAN DIEGO) 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAKESIDE CA SAN DIEGO 323 FTE
CITY-NEAR AM Ortega (Lakeside) 249 FTE
NAT-TCR Northwest Confections Michigan, LLC 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DPX7 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR PAM Specialty Hospital of Denver 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Coop Studies Unit 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE LaVergne TN IP 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Purdy Brothers Trucking White Post, VA 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Intec 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastern Lift Truck Co., Inc. Br2 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.