Machine rigging · New York

Sanford Industrial Contractors, Inc.

Manchester, NY · ~20 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sanford Industrial Contractors, Inc. runs at 195% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Machine rigging workplace, earning a grade D.

Sanford Industrial Contractors, Inc.: 5.5 TCR = 195% of Machine rigging BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sanford Industrial Contractors, Inc. safety composite

Sanford Industrial Contractors, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2024

Sanford Industrial Contractors, Inc. injury rate improved

Sanford Industrial Contractors, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.9 from 4.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.9 · 2017=11.5 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=12.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Manchester, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 195% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #62/67
  • PHOTO Gourmet Boutique LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gourmet Boutique LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Sanford Industrial Contractors, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sanford Industrial Contractors, Inc. averages 5.5 TCR (195% of the Machine rigging BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sanford Industrial Contractors, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.9 · 2017=11.5 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=12.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Sanford Industrial Contractors, Inc. falls in its industry

1,138 Machine rigging establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 67 Machine rigging employers in New York.

Sanford Industrial Contractors, Inc. (20 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sanford Industrial Contractors, Inc.
Sanford Industrial Contractors, Inc. (20 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Sanford Industrial Contractors, Inc. has fewer employees than the Machine rigging median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 12.6 12.6 2 0 0
2022 6.9 6.9 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 11.5 11.5 2 0 0
2016 4.9 4.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · NY · Manchester

1,138 Machine rigging employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 4 employers in Manchester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gourmet Boutique LLC 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Martin Overhead Garage Door Service Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Overhead Door Company 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 630 - Baltimore 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE JOHNSON POTATO FARMS LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beds & Borders, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE J. Minns Farms LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE H. F. Corwin & Son, Inc. 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROCHESTER INSULATED GLASS, INC. 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sidco Filter Company 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Green Renewable Inc.Manchester 36 FTE
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 229 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR IBC Coatings Technologies Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Light Health Center 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR UBY 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Swiss Precision Products, Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pioneer College Caterers, Inc. - Unit 032/Cairn University 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caruthersville 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suburban Tool & Die Co., Inc. 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.