Vaccines (i.e., bacterial, virus) manufacturing · Texas

Sanofi Pastuer Field Sales North Central Region

Austin, TX · ~99 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sanofi Pastuer Field Sales North Central Region runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Vaccines (i.e., bacterial, virus) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Sanofi Pastuer Field Sales North Central Region: 0.3 TCR = 10% of Vaccines (i.e., bacterial, virus) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sanofi Pastuer Field Sales North Central Region safety composite

Sanofi Pastuer Field Sales North Central Region scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sanofi Pastuer Field Sales North Central Region held a steady TCR band

Sanofi Pastuer Field Sales North Central Region's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.0 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325414 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/10
  • PHOTO Brammer Bio Lexington
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~99 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brammer Bio Lexington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Sanofi Pastuer Field Sales North Central Region in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sanofi Pastuer Field Sales North Central Region averages 0.3 TCR (10% of the Vaccines (i.e., bacterial, virus) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sanofi Pastuer Field Sales North Central Region TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Sanofi Pastuer Field Sales North Central Region falls in its industry

234 Vaccines (i.e., bacterial, vir establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 10 Vaccines (i.e., bacterial, vir employers in Texas.

Sanofi Pastuer Field Sales North Central Region (99 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 198 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Sanofi Pastuer Field Sales North Central Region
Sanofi Pastuer Field Sales North Central Region (99 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 198 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Sanofi Pastuer Field Sales North Central Region has fewer employees than the Vaccines (i.e., bacterial, virus) manufa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325414 · TX · Austin

234 Vaccines (i.e., bacterial, virus) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brammer Bio Lexington 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recursion Pharmaceuticals HQ 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Andelyn Biosciences - Corporate Center 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boehringer Ingelheim Duluth 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE TXMCF 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andrews Brigade Energy Services 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enphase Energy Austin TX 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE JLB Partners, LP 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Wegmans Corporate Woods CRPWDS 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ILS - Memphis 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dakkota Corporate Brighton 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR UTAS Rockford Plant 6 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE FCHC Medical Care LLC 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ragle, Inc. 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE S05998 - WM of Broward County MA Office 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Hill Leasing, LLC 99 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.