Bonded warehousing, refrigerated · Pennsylvania

Sanofi Taylor Distribution

Taylor, PA · ~102 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sanofi Taylor Distribution runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bonded warehousing, refrigerated workplace, earning a grade A.

Sanofi Taylor Distribution: 1.4 TCR = 25% of Bonded warehousing, refrigerated BLS 5.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sanofi Taylor Distribution safety composite

Sanofi Taylor Distribution scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2024

Sanofi Taylor Distribution injury rate improved

Sanofi Taylor Distribution's TCR fell 3.8 from 4.7 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Taylor, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/52
  • PHOTO RLS Logistics Cold S…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RLS Logistics Cold Storage of Lebanon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Sanofi Taylor Distribution in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sanofi Taylor Distribution averages 1.4 TCR (25% of the Bonded warehousing, refrigerated BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sanofi Taylor Distribution TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=0 · 2019=1 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 5.8

Where Sanofi Taylor Distribution falls in its industry

1,039 Bonded warehousing, refrigerat establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 52 Bonded warehousing, refrigerat employers in Pennsylvania.

Sanofi Taylor Distribution (102 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sanofi Taylor Distribution
Sanofi Taylor Distribution (102 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Sanofi Taylor Distribution has more employees than the Bonded warehousing, refrigerated median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.7 4.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · PA · Taylor

1,039 Bonded warehousing, refrigerated employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 20 employers in Taylor, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RLS Logistics Cold Storage of Lebanon 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seafrigo Coldstorage Chicago 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Americold Murfreesboro, TN 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corportation 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verano PA CPG - Agri-Kind 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE McKee Management Associates, Inc. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bakers Pittsburgh 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Structures Division 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4276 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR PASCR - SCRANTON 311 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4276 297 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCRANTON (PASCR) 290 FTE
NAT-TCR Winston Steel, LLC - Junia Location 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Assembly Facility 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Henkels & McCoy, Illinois - Salem 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR New Mexico State University 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE National Operations Center 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE FCL Builders, LLC 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pine Meadows Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier IL 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.