General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) · Texas

Santa Barbara Freight Corp

Carrollton, TX · ~47 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Santa Barbara Freight Corp runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) workplace, earning a grade D.

Santa Barbara Freight Corp: 6.6 TCR = 146% of General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Santa Barbara Freight Corp safety composite

Santa Barbara Freight Corp scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Santa Barbara Freight Corp: 3.8 → 5.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 14.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.57× in 2024

Santa Barbara Freight Corp's TCR rose 1.8 from 3.8 in 2018 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Carrollton, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 146% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #178/237
  • PHOTO 037-COL
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 037-COL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Santa Barbara Freight Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Santa Barbara Freight Corp averages 6.6 TCR (146% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Santa Barbara Freight Corp TCR series: 2018=3.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=14.7 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Santa Barbara Freight Corp falls in its industry

3,020 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #178 safest of 237 General freight trucking, long employers in Texas.

Santa Barbara Freight Corp (47 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Santa Barbara Freight Corp
Santa Barbara Freight Corp (47 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Santa Barbara Freight Corp has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 3.7 3 0 0
2021 14.7 6.3 7 0 0
2020 8.7 4.3 1 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.8 3.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · TX · Carrollton

3,020 General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 331 employers in Carrollton, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 037-COL 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix 297 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Modesto CA FXFE-MOD 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oak Harbor - SCA/NV - 035 - LVS 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blackstone Dilworth 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hartley Feeders 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Handley Station 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. Pearsall Energy Center 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4263-35281 2,390 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Brandt Companies, LLC 2,166 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elite Line Services - Amazon Account 1,669 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Carrollton 1,520 FTE
NAT-TCR Eastern Iowa Light and Power Cooperative 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR B&M Finishers Inc 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cascade Cement Contracting Inc 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hander Inc 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE GNH Services, Inc 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heaton Erecting 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edgewood manor of wellston 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tank Technology, inc. 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.