Valves, plumbing and heating, merchant wholesalers · California

Santa Fe Springs Winwater

Santa Fe Springs, CA · ~33 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Santa Fe Springs Winwater runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Valves, plumbing and heating, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Santa Fe Springs Winwater: 4.9 TCR = 221% of Valves, plumbing and heating, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Santa Fe Springs Winwater safety composite

Santa Fe Springs Winwater scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.7

2017→2020

Santa Fe Springs Winwater injury rate improved

Santa Fe Springs Winwater's TCR fell 9.7 from 9.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.7 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423720 · Santa Fe Springs, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.9 · 221% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #50/85
  • PHOTO Ferguson Enterprises…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ferguson Enterprises LLC: NY Maspeth - 5722 49th Street (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Santa Fe Springs Winwater in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Santa Fe Springs Winwater averages 4.9 TCR (221% of the Valves, plumbing and heating, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Santa Fe Springs Winwater TCR series: 2017=9.7 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Santa Fe Springs Winwater falls in its industry

853 Valves, plumbing and heating, establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 85 Valves, plumbing and heating, employers in California.

Santa Fe Springs Winwater (33 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Santa Fe Springs Winwater
Santa Fe Springs Winwater (33 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Santa Fe Springs Winwater has fewer employees than the Valves, plumbing and heating, merchant w median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 9.7 7.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423720 · CA · Santa Fe Springs

853 Valves, plumbing and heating, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 310 employers in Santa Fe Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ferguson Enterprises LLC: NY Maspeth - 5722 49th Street 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hajoca Corporation - 563 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Etna Supply - Traverse City 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4192-00051155-43 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tutti Frutti Farms 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL CENTRO 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS 18 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Vista Farms LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 423 3,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
NAT-TCR CrossCountry Freight Solutions - Fargo 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Stroum Jewish Community Center 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR New Britain Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Flex-N-Gate Oklahoma 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Colver Power Project 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wyndham Vacation Resorts Royal Garden at Waikiki 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beck Cabinet Company 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haarslev Kansas City 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.