Skilled Nursing Facility · Florida

Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center

Sarasota, FL · ~102 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Skilled Nursing Facility workplace, earning a grade A.

Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center: 2.2 TCR = 33% of Skilled Nursing Facility BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2021→2024

Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.6 in 2021 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.6 · 2022=5.0 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Sarasota, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.2 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #103/809
  • PHOTO Covington Skilled Nu…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Covington Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center averages 2.2 TCR (33% of the Skilled Nursing Facility BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2021=2.6 · 2022=5 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled Nursing Facility establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #103 safest of 809 Skilled Nursing Facility employers in Florida.

Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center (102 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center
Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center (102 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Sarasota Health and Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Skilled Nursing Facility median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2023 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2022 5.0 4.0 5 0 0
2021 2.6 2.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · FL · Sarasota

15,252 Skilled Nursing Facility employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 504 employers in Sarasota, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Covington Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benedictine Living Community La Crosse 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CORP-KNUTE-CORPORATE 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lawrence Street Health Care Center 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Immokalee Packing 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Southeast Florida (Coconut Creek) 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Structural Building Components LP 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beneva Lakes 3,238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Butterfly- Lakewood Ranch 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Connexis Physicians 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treasures Thrift Shop II 2,476 FTE
NAT-TCR Lithium Division 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR OLG Acadia General Hospital 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Covington Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Branch 3887 - Methuen MA 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE SV Delivery LLC 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE L.J. Zucca Vineland, NJ 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Verano PA CPG - Agri-Kind 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metalcrafters Inc. 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.