Residential Intellectual & Developmental Disability Facilties · Florida

Sarasota Manatee Day Program

Bradenton, FL · ~33 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sarasota Manatee Day Program runs at 462% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Residential Intellectual & Developmental Disability Facilties workplace, earning a grade F.

Sarasota Manatee Day Program: 17.6 TCR = 462% of Residential Intellectual & Developmental Disability Facilties BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sarasota Manatee Day Program safety composite

Sarasota Manatee Day Program scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.0

2017→2019

Sarasota Manatee Day Program injury rate improved

Sarasota Manatee Day Program's TCR fell 6.0 from 19.7 in 2017 to 13.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 19.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=19.7 · 2018=19.2 · 2019=13.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Bradenton, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.6 · 462% of ind

  • DART 6.9 DART
  • RANK #87/92
  • PHOTO North Campus
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: North Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Sarasota Manatee Day Program in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sarasota Manatee Day Program averages 17.6 TCR (462% of the Residential Intellectual & Developmental Disability Facilties BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sarasota Manatee Day Program TCR series: 2017=19.7 · 2018=19.2 · 2019=13.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Sarasota Manatee Day Program falls in its industry

2,261 Residential Intellectual & Dev establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 92 Residential Intellectual & Dev employers in Florida.

Sarasota Manatee Day Program (33 employees, TCR 17.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sarasota Manatee Day Program
Sarasota Manatee Day Program (33 employees, TCR 17.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Sarasota Manatee Day Program has fewer employees than the Residential Intellectual & Developmental median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 13.8 6.9 2 0 0
2018 19.2 14.4 4 0 0
2017 19.7 19.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · FL · Bradenton

2,261 Residential Intellectual & Developmental Disability Facilties employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 259 employers in Bradenton, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR North Campus 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dunkirk Day Program 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trudeau Road IRA 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Springbrook NY Inc - LeChase House 537 17.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Yee Farms Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE OZBLU USA LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE POK-Okeechobee Clean Energy Center 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant City Office 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bradenton Hospice House 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bradenton Office 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bradenton Life (Pace) Manatee Srvc Ctr 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Connexis Physicians Bradenton 2,476 FTE
NAT-TCR IA,SHELDON - Campus - Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities) 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Republic National Distributing Company 20 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lumber Specialties - Dyersville Truss 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Clair Shores Dpw/Water/Sewer/Motor Pool 17.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE SealMaster 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE 09Y1 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Biscoe 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Global Compressor 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.