Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding · Texas

Saratoga Surgical Center

Corpus Christi, TX · ~29 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Saratoga Surgical Center runs at 348% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding workplace, earning a grade F.

Saratoga Surgical Center: 13.2 TCR = 348% of Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Saratoga Surgical Center safety composite

Saratoga Surgical Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Saratoga Surgical Center: 0.0 → 26.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 27.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Saratoga Surgical Center's TCR rose 26.1 from 0.0 in 2018 to 26.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 27.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621493 · Corpus Christi, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.2 · 348% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #46/48
  • PHOTO HHC Hartford Surgery…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HHC Hartford Surgery Center LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Saratoga Surgical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Saratoga Surgical Center averages 13.2 TCR (348% of the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Saratoga Surgical Center TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=25.9 · 2023=27.4 · 2024=26.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Saratoga Surgical Center falls in its industry

498 Ambulatory surgical centers an establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 48 Ambulatory surgical centers an employers in Texas.

Saratoga Surgical Center (29 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Saratoga Surgical Center
Saratoga Surgical Center (29 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2

Saratoga Surgical Center has fewer employees than the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 26.1 0.0 5 3 0
2023 27.4 0.0 6 1 0
2022 25.9 0.0 7 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621493 · TX · Corpus Christi

498 Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 553 employers in Corpus Christi, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HHC Hartford Surgery Center LLC 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pm Pediatrics 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Surgical Suites 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Palm Beach GP, LLC 13.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Hereford 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pepper Dairy 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE SROOC Holding LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Logging, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX Corpus Christi 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Driscoll Health Systems 2,730 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Ltd. 2,536 FTE
CITY-NEAR Driscoll Children's Hospital 2,490 FTE
NAT-TCR Evergreen Senior Living- Orland Park 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Remcon Plastics 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HGR2 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Husky Products, LLC 13.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Big R of Conifer, LLC. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE R B Machine Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lanakila Pacific - Hickam Hale Aina Dining Facility 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Island Energy Company, LLC 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.