Loaded computer boards manufacturing · Ohio

Sarica Manufacturing Company Ltd

Urbana, OH · ~59 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sarica Manufacturing Company Ltd runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Loaded computer boards manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Sarica Manufacturing Company Ltd: 0.7 TCR = 21% of Loaded computer boards manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sarica Manufacturing Company Ltd safety composite

Sarica Manufacturing Company Ltd scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sarica Manufacturing Company Ltd held a steady TCR band

Sarica Manufacturing Company Ltd's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334418 · Urbana, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/13
  • PHOTO Aragra - Innovative …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aragra - Innovative Electronics, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Sarica Manufacturing Company Ltd in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sarica Manufacturing Company Ltd averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the Loaded computer boards manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sarica Manufacturing Company Ltd TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Sarica Manufacturing Company Ltd falls in its industry

236 Loaded computer boards manufac establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 13 Loaded computer boards manufac employers in Ohio.

Sarica Manufacturing Company Ltd (59 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Sarica Manufacturing Company Ltd
Sarica Manufacturing Company Ltd (59 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Sarica Manufacturing Company Ltd has fewer employees than the Loaded computer boards manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2020 2.7 0.0 2 0 0
2019 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334418 · OH · Urbana

236 Loaded computer boards manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 50 employers in Urbana, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aragra - Innovative Electronics, Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR BAE Systems Electronic Systems ENY 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TX005 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TTM Technologies (Anaren) 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Transmission Columbus Svc Ctr 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE JK Excavating, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brumbaugh Construction, Inc 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moraine Office & Miscellaneous Projects 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rittal North America LLC 602 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nelson Tree Service LLC 555 FTE
CITY-NEAR Honeywell Aerospace - Urbana 481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nelson Tree Service, LLC 460 473 FTE
NAT-TCR Mac Haik Chevrolet LTD 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR H2A Complete II, Inc.Anzualda Harvesting, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Micron INC. Manassas, VA 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Wellspring Family Services 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE True Line Coring & Cutting of Tennessee 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Litchfield ISD #465-Wagner School 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henderson Yard 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE ITP of USA 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.