Fruit sorting, grading, and packing · California

Saticoy Lemon Association - Santa Paula

Santa Paula, CA · ~130 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Saticoy Lemon Association - Santa Paula runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fruit sorting, grading, and packing workplace, earning a grade B.

Saticoy Lemon Association - Santa Paula: 3.6 TCR = 79% of Fruit sorting, grading, and packing BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Saticoy Lemon Association - Santa Paula safety composite

Saticoy Lemon Association - Santa Paula scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2022→2024

Saticoy Lemon Association - Santa Paula injury rate improved

Saticoy Lemon Association - Santa Paula's TCR fell 1.4 from 4.5 in 2022 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.5 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115114 · Santa Paula, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.6 · 79% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #73/236
  • PHOTO Mission Citrus
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~130 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mission Citrus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Saticoy Lemon Association - Santa Paula in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Saticoy Lemon Association - Santa Paula averages 3.6 TCR (79% of the Fruit sorting, grading, and packing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Saticoy Lemon Association - Santa Paula TCR series: 2022=4.5 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Saticoy Lemon Association - Santa Paula falls in its industry

666 Fruit sorting, grading, and pa establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 236 Fruit sorting, grading, and pa employers in California.

Saticoy Lemon Association - Santa Paula (130 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Saticoy Lemon Association - Santa Paula
Saticoy Lemon Association - Santa Paula (130 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Saticoy Lemon Association - Santa Paula has more employees than the Fruit sorting, grading, and packing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 3.1 4 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 4 0 0
2022 4.5 4.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115114 · CA · Santa Paula

666 Fruit sorting, grading, and packing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 45 employers in Santa Paula, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mission Citrus 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huller Sheller 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2058-Haleiwa, HI 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prima Wawona - Plant 11 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE TRCC, Inc. 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sierra Land and Cattle Co LLC 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE MODESTO SERVICE CENTER 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fontana Water Company 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 203 2,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hot Line Construction Santa Paula 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR TLF 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR SantaPaulaHospital 173 FTE
NAT-TCR Whitehall West 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - WML1 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Iten Industries Inc. (Plant 4) 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Toft Dairy Inc 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Accurus Aerospace - Wichita 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mr Greens Produce - Plant City 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dj Jacobetti Hme Fr Vet - Dmva 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henry Ford Medical Center Bloomfield Township 130 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.