Printing, flexographic (except books, grey goods) · Florida

SATO America Daytona Beach

Daytona Beach, FL · ~27 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SATO America Daytona Beach runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Printing, flexographic (except books, grey goods) workplace, earning a grade A.

SATO America Daytona Beach: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Printing, flexographic (except books, grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SATO America Daytona Beach safety composite

SATO America Daytona Beach scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

SATO America Daytona Beach held a steady TCR band

SATO America Daytona Beach's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=3.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Daytona Beach, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/63
  • PHOTO Weldon, Williams & L…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

SATO America Daytona Beach in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SATO America Daytona Beach averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Printing, flexographic (except books, grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SATO America Daytona Beach TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2020=3.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where SATO America Daytona Beach falls in its industry

2,001 Printing, flexographic (except establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 63 Printing, flexographic (except employers in Florida.

SATO America Daytona Beach (27 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate SATO America Daytona Beach
SATO America Daytona Beach (27 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

SATO America Daytona Beach has fewer employees than the Printing, flexographic (except books, gr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · FL · Daytona Beach

2,001 Printing, flexographic (except books, grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 249 employers in Daytona Beach, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2446_15137 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Taylor Comms - Radcliff KY - 0222-KYRA1 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PV Communications, Inc. 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE C. ELTON CREWS, INC. 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Homestead 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Oasis 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cocoa Sod 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Memorial Medical Center 2,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Daytona Beach 2,460 FTE
CITY-NEAR SMA Healthcare, Inc 1,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bethune Cookman University 682 FTE
NAT-TCR Viking Access Systems 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 9215-JAN 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Alpha Carb Enterprises, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Four Corners Brewery 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Office 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Powder Coating Plus, LLC 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wheaton & Son's 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evergreen Endoscopy Center, LLC 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.