Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing · Minnesota

Sauk Rapids Office

Sauk Rapids, MN · ~73 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sauk Rapids Office runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Sauk Rapids Office: 3.6 TCR = 109% of Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sauk Rapids Office safety composite

Sauk Rapids Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2017→2024

Sauk Rapids Office injury rate improved

Sauk Rapids Office's TCR fell 6.6 from 6.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.6 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333413 · Sauk Rapids, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 109% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Henderson Engineerin…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Henderson Engineering Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Sauk Rapids Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sauk Rapids Office averages 3.6 TCR (109% of the Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sauk Rapids Office TCR series: 2017=6.6 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Sauk Rapids Office falls in its industry

232 Fans, industrial and commercia establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Fans, industrial and commercia employers in Minnesota.

Sauk Rapids Office (73 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sauk Rapids Office
Sauk Rapids Office (73 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Sauk Rapids Office has fewer employees than the Fans, industrial and commercial-type, ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.2 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2020 5.9 2.9 4 0 0
2019 5.7 1.4 4 0 0
2018 5.8 1.4 4 0 0
2017 6.6 3.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333413 · MN · Sauk Rapids

232 Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 50 employers in Sauk Rapids, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Henderson Engineering Co., Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Falls Filtration Technologies, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camfil - Corcoran (071) 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR DOAS/TAP OK 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Sleepy Eye 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kellington 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE D&D Shop - 23405 Ct Rd 10 Corcoran 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE U.S. SiteWork, Inc. 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sauk Rapids-Rice Public Schools 779 FTE
CITY-NEAR J-Berd Mechanical Contractors INC 487 FTE
CITY-NEAR J-Berd Mechanical 386 FTE
CITY-NEAR 320141 - Various Mobile 306 FTE
NAT-TCR Koch Metal 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Abw 114/118 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MWC Group, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR G3 Enterprises, Inc. - Chicago Regional Distribution Center 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coil Manufacturing Inc 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Epoxy Technology, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midco International Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lamothermic Corporation 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.