Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) · Georgia

Savannah SAV

Savannah, GA · ~60 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Savannah SAV runs at 242% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) workplace, earning a grade F.

Savannah SAV: 10.9 TCR = 242% of Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Savannah SAV safety composite

Savannah SAV scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.7

2016→2024

Savannah SAV injury rate improved

Savannah SAV's TCR fell 13.7 from 17.9 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 20.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.9 · 2017=15.1 · 2018=17.5 · 2019=20.0 · 2020=8.0 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Savannah, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.9 · 242% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #105/113
  • PHOTO Oak Harbor - NCA/NV …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oak Harbor - NCA/NV - 026 - SBY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Savannah SAV in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Savannah SAV averages 10.9 TCR (242% of the Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Savannah SAV TCR series: 2016=17.9 · 2017=15.1 · 2018=17.5 · 2019=20 · 2020=8 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Savannah SAV falls in its industry

3,020 Trucking, general freight, lon establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #105 safest of 113 Trucking, general freight, lon employers in Georgia.

Savannah SAV (60 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Savannah SAV
Savannah SAV (60 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Savannah SAV has more employees than the Trucking, general freight, long-distance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 4.2 3 0 0
2023 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2022 2.7 1.8 3 0 0
2021 8.1 6.9 7 0 0
2020 8.0 6.4 5 0 0
2019 20.0 16.0 10 0 0
2018 17.5 8.7 8 0 0
2017 15.1 12.6 6 0 0
2016 17.9 11.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · GA · Savannah

3,020 Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 511 employers in Savannah, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oak Harbor - NCA/NV - 026 - SBY 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holland - CT 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bowling Green Shuttle 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DEN Denver 10.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dalton Hatchery 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Fulton Operating - 116675 Wills Road 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gainesville District - Jackson EMC 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prestwick Companies 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gulfstream Aerospace 13,245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical Center 3,186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Savannah College of Art and Design 2,369 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical 2,056 FTE
NAT-TCR Omnia Advanced Materials LLC 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bucklin Point Wastewater Treatment Facility 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Steel Plus Inc DBA Flintwood Metals Inc 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Konrad Beer Distributor, Inc. 10.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Decatur Dec 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE St.Louis Stl 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3145 Keystone / 8606 KAO Logistics 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peanut Butter 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.