Paper (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood) manufacturing · Ohio

Saybrook Converting Center

Ashtabula, OH · ~163 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Saybrook Converting Center runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Paper (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Saybrook Converting Center: 2.3 TCR = 68% of Paper (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Saybrook Converting Center safety composite

Saybrook Converting Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Saybrook Converting Center: 1.9 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 4.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2021

Saybrook Converting Center's TCR rose 2.3 from 1.9 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322121 · Ashtabula, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 68% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #12/21
  • PHOTO NAPP Reading Mill - …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~163 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NAPP Reading Mill - 015 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Saybrook Converting Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Saybrook Converting Center averages 2.3 TCR (68% of the Paper (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Saybrook Converting Center TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Saybrook Converting Center falls in its industry

317 Paper (except newsprint, uncoa establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 21 Paper (except newsprint, uncoa employers in Ohio.

Saybrook Converting Center (163 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 146 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Saybrook Converting Center
Saybrook Converting Center (163 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 146 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Saybrook Converting Center has more employees than the Paper (except newsprint, uncoated ground median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.2 2.5 4 1 0
2020 1.5 0.0 2 0 0
2019 3.3 3.3 6 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 4 0 0
2017 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 1.9 1.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322121 · OH · Ashtabula

317 Paper (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 85 employers in Ashtabula, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NAPP Reading Mill - 015 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ND Paper 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delaware (PC) 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richmond- Paper - B312 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Acoustic Ceiling & Partition 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boak & Sons, Inc. 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Piqua Steel Company, Inc dba PSC Crane & Rigging 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Packaging - Olmsted Falls 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ashtabula County Medical Center 976 FTE
CITY-NEAR Molded Fiber Glass Composite Systems Company 456 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2359 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2359 388 FTE
NAT-TCR Plant H6 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Materion - Reading 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Poco Graphite Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Progressive Physical Therapy 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holmes Building Materials - Airline 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rapid Micro Biosystems 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE NPS Holdings LLC Cudahy 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwest Tennessee Human Resource Agency 163 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.