Rest homes with nursing care · Ohio

Saybrook Landing Health and Rehabilitation

Ashtabula, OH · ~95 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Saybrook Landing Health and Rehabilitation runs at 157% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Rest homes with nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Saybrook Landing Health and Rehabilitation: 10.2 TCR = 157% of Rest homes with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Saybrook Landing Health and Rehabilitation safety composite

Saybrook Landing Health and Rehabilitation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Saybrook Landing Health and Rehabilitation: 1.4 → 21.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 80.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2.15× in 2021

Saybrook Landing Health and Rehabilitation's TCR rose 20.5 from 1.4 in 2018 to 21.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 80.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 2.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Ashtabula, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 10.2 · 157% of ind

  • DART 21.9 DART
  • RANK #781/1074
  • PHOTO Mary Wade Home
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mary Wade Home (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Saybrook Landing Health and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Saybrook Landing Health and Rehabilitation averages 10.2 TCR (157% of the Rest homes with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Saybrook Landing Health and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2018=1.4 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=80 · 2021=21.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Saybrook Landing Health and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Rest homes with nursing care establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #781 safest of 1074 Rest homes with nursing care employers in Ohio.

Saybrook Landing Health and Rehabilitation (95 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Saybrook Landing Health and Rehabilitation
Saybrook Landing Health and Rehabilitation (95 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Saybrook Landing Health and Rehabilitation has fewer employees than the Rest homes with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 21.9 21.9 4 8 0
2020 80.0 80.0 5 20 0
2019 7.3 7.3 5 1 0
2018 1.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Ashtabula

15,252 Rest homes with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 85 employers in Ashtabula, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mary Wade Home 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Manor - Pana #129 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bradford Oaks Center 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR University Village Thousand Oaks 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. - Grand Rapids, OH Production Plant 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Continental Building Company 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bowlin Services LLC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Schaefer Group, Inc. 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ashtabula County Medical Center 976 FTE
CITY-NEAR Molded Fiber Glass Composite Systems Company 456 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2359 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2359 388 FTE
NAT-TCR Heritage Manor - Pana #129 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HDS-Jackson 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Homewood Suites Mobile East Bay/Daphne 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wbn 204 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Express One Logistics, Inc. 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kane Warehousing, Inc., GA 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Diego Central 47210 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Two Rivers Middle Magnet School 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.