Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation · South Carolina

SC Voc Rehab Anderson

Anderson, SC · ~35 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SC Voc Rehab Anderson runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation workplace, earning a grade B.

SC Voc Rehab Anderson: 1.9 TCR = 51% of Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SC Voc Rehab Anderson safety composite

SC Voc Rehab Anderson scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SC Voc Rehab Anderson: 2.4 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

SC Voc Rehab Anderson's TCR rose 1.3 from 2.4 in 2018 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Anderson, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 51% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/33
  • PHOTO Jackson Developmenta…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jackson Developmental Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

SC Voc Rehab Anderson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SC Voc Rehab Anderson averages 1.9 TCR (51% of the Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SC Voc Rehab Anderson TCR series: 2018=2.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 3.8

Where SC Voc Rehab Anderson falls in its industry

1,455 Job training, vocational rehab establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 33 Job training, vocational rehab employers in South Carolina.

SC Voc Rehab Anderson (35 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate SC Voc Rehab Anderson
SC Voc Rehab Anderson (35 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

SC Voc Rehab Anderson has fewer employees than the Job training, vocational rehabilitation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · SC · Anderson

1,455 Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 167 employers in Anderson, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jackson Developmental Industries 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6732_15604 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR RHODE ISLAND CAMPUS 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Building 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conway Service Center and Warehouse 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE FLORENCE DISTRICT OFFICE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Delivery Operations (Charleston) 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darlington County Water & Sewer Authority 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR AnMed Medical Center 2,374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anmed Health Medical Center 1,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bosch AdP 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdP 1,314 FTE
NAT-TCR NA-US-CA-Livermore-201-Discovery-Dr-Warehouse 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MoPOP 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SCWA - Concorse 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR FIBA Technologies - Midvale OH 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Milpitas Materials Co. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE IMEC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concord Store 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Molly Maid of Greater Clear Lake 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.