Job counseling, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation · South Carolina

SC Voc Rehab Charleston

North Charleston, SC · ~23 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SC Voc Rehab Charleston runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Job counseling, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation workplace, earning a grade D.

SC Voc Rehab Charleston: 5.3 TCR = 140% of Job counseling, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SC Voc Rehab Charleston safety composite

SC Voc Rehab Charleston scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SC Voc Rehab Charleston: 2.8 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 14.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

SC Voc Rehab Charleston's TCR rose 2.0 from 2.8 in 2018 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · North Charleston, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 140% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/33
  • PHOTO SW Resources, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SW Resources, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

SC Voc Rehab Charleston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SC Voc Rehab Charleston averages 5.3 TCR (140% of the Job counseling, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SC Voc Rehab Charleston TCR series: 2018=2.8 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=4.3 · 2022=14.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.8

Where SC Voc Rehab Charleston falls in its industry

1,455 Job counseling, vocational reh establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 33 Job counseling, vocational reh employers in South Carolina.

SC Voc Rehab Charleston (23 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate SC Voc Rehab Charleston
SC Voc Rehab Charleston (23 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

SC Voc Rehab Charleston has fewer employees than the Job counseling, vocational rehabilitatio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 14.7 7.3 2 0 0
2020 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 5.4 5.4 1 0 0
2018 2.8 2.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · SC · North Charleston

1,455 Job counseling, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 256 employers in North Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SW Resources, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SAFB Commissary 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wythe/Bland Center 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robesonia Store 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE TRI COUNTY COTTON GROWERS, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hartsville Complex 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marlboro Electric Cooperative, Inc. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE BLYTHEWOOD CREW QUARTERS 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charleston County 2,601 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Goodwill Services 1,105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trident Medical Center 1,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR SRC Charleston ISS Division 815 FTE
NAT-TCR Blackshear Fresh Egg Production 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Burley Clay Products Company 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest Wire Products, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR S&S Electric Oldsmar 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Moffat Plastering 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Finney County PBX 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wyoming Block 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Freeport Place 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.