Freight transportation, inland waters (except on Great Lakes system) · Illinois

SCF Lewis & Clark Terminals

Granite City, IL · ~80 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SCF Lewis & Clark Terminals runs at 161% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Freight transportation, inland waters (except on Great Lakes system) workplace, earning a grade D.

SCF Lewis & Clark Terminals: 7.3 TCR = 161% of Freight transportation, inland waters (except on Great Lakes system) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SCF Lewis & Clark Terminals safety composite

SCF Lewis & Clark Terminals scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

SCF Lewis & Clark Terminals held a steady TCR band

SCF Lewis & Clark Terminals's TCR held near 0.3 from 7.8 in 2016 to 8.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.8 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=8.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 483211 · Granite City, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 161% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO SCF Lewis & Clark Fl…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SCF Lewis & Clark Fleeting (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

SCF Lewis & Clark Terminals in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SCF Lewis & Clark Terminals averages 7.3 TCR (161% of the Freight transportation, inland waters (except on Great Lakes system) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SCF Lewis & Clark Terminals TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=5 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=8.1 · BLS 4.5

Where SCF Lewis & Clark Terminals falls in its industry

48 Freight transportation, inland establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Freight transportation, inland employers in Illinois.

SCF Lewis & Clark Terminals (80 employees, TCR 7.3) among 27 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 28 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate SCF Lewis & Clark Terminals
SCF Lewis & Clark Terminals (80 employees, TCR 7.3) among 27 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 2.2

SCF Lewis & Clark Terminals has fewer employees than the Freight transportation, inland waters (e median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.1 5.4 6 0 0
2021 6.8 5.4 5 0 0
2020 5.0 2.5 4 0 0
2019 8.7 7.4 7 0 0
2018 7.8 6.7 7 0 0
2017 6.7 6.7 6 0 0
2016 7.8 5.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

483211 · IL · Granite City

48 Freight transportation, inland waters (except on Great Lakes system) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 80 employers in Granite City, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SCF Lewis & Clark Fleeting 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mercer Trucking Co., Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR EEI 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kirby Offshore Marine Operations 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crestwood Reporting Center 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Eastern - IL Gas Ops 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE 74G - Eastern - IL Gas Ops 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Granite City Works 976 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amsted Rail Company Inc 797 FTE
CITY-NEAR Granite City Plant 563 FTE
CITY-NEAR icon Mechanical LLC 448 FTE
NAT-TCR Ferwnood Resort 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0027-0026-04483 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0020-0020-03658 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR BRP Holdings LLC ST9 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE JFShea Construction-KY 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Red Hawk Fire Protection 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ctwal - Wallingford 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Good Samaritan Society - Scandia Village 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.