Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator · California

Schaefer Equipment, Inc.

Ontario, CA · ~11 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schaefer Equipment, Inc. runs at 643% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator workplace, earning a grade F.

Schaefer Equipment, Inc.: 9.0 TCR = 643% of Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator BLS 1.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schaefer Equipment, Inc. safety composite

Schaefer Equipment, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.4

2017→2024

Schaefer Equipment, Inc. injury rate improved

Schaefer Equipment, Inc.'s TCR fell 17.4 from 17.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 17.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.4 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=17.4 · 2021=14.1 · 2022=15.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 532412 · Ontario, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 643% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/34
  • PHOTO 06B
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~11 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 06B (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Schaefer Equipment, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schaefer Equipment, Inc. averages 9.0 TCR (643% of the Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schaefer Equipment, Inc. TCR series: 2017=17.4 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=17.4 · 2021=14.1 · 2022=15.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Schaefer Equipment, Inc. falls in its industry

270 Construction machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 34 Construction machinery and equ employers in California.

Schaefer Equipment, Inc. (11 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Schaefer Equipment, Inc.
Schaefer Equipment, Inc. (11 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Schaefer Equipment, Inc. has fewer employees than the Construction machinery and equipment ren median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 15.2 15.2 1 0 0
2021 14.1 14.1 1 0 0
2020 17.4 17.4 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.8 7.8 1 0 0
2017 17.4 8.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

532412 · CA · Ontario

270 Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 06B 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leppo Rents - Akron 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Total 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PDQ Rentals Temecula 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Tomato Farming | Firebaugh 11 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chavez Ranch 11 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4R Farming, Inc. 11 FTE
STATE-SIZE Famoso Nut Company,LLC - Kyte 11 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Peoria Hospitals Mobile Medical Services ABA Advanced Medical Transport of Central Illinois 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HBC Services Company (W003) 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cincinnati 062 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DC4 9.0 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.