Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing · Michigan

Schain Mold & Engineering

Rochester Hills, MI · ~44 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schain Mold & Engineering runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Schain Mold & Engineering: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schain Mold & Engineering safety composite

Schain Mold & Engineering scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2022→2024

Schain Mold & Engineering injury rate improved

Schain Mold & Engineering's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.1 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · Rochester Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/42
  • PHOTO Hosokawa Micron Powd…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hosokawa Micron Powder Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Schain Mold & Engineering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schain Mold & Engineering averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schain Mold & Engineering TCR series: 2022=2.1 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Schain Mold & Engineering falls in its industry

448 Injection molding machinery fo establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 42 Injection molding machinery fo employers in Michigan.

Schain Mold & Engineering (44 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Schain Mold & Engineering
Schain Mold & Engineering (44 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Schain Mold & Engineering has fewer employees than the Injection molding machinery for plastics median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.1 2.0 1 1 0
2022 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · MI · Rochester Hills

448 Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 107 employers in Rochester Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hosokawa Micron Powder Systems 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NOV Dayton (FMS) 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pope Scientific, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regal Beloit America (Plastics) 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE NW Planning & Design Center 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEMCO Energy Gas Company - Macomb 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genesee County Water & Waste Services 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anthony Ragnone Treatment Plant 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR FANUC America Corporation - Rochester Hills 1,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford- Rochester Hills Data Center 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester Hills Data Center 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR InfuSystem, Inc. - Headquarters 367 FTE
NAT-TCR Benedictine Living Community-Minneapolis 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Tucker Mechanical, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Enterprise Builders 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Selland Construction - WA 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ford of Greenfield 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stewart & Jasper Processing 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stewart & Jasper Orchards 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Upstate Farms Cultured Products LLC 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.