Warehousing and storage, general merchandise · Iowa

Schenker Inc. (P&G - Iowa City)

Iowa City, IA · ~65 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schenker Inc. (P&G - Iowa City) runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

Schenker Inc. (P&G - Iowa City): 0.8 TCR = 14% of Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schenker Inc. (P&G - Iowa City) safety composite

Schenker Inc. (P&G - Iowa City) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2020

Schenker Inc. (P&G - Iowa City) injury rate improved

Schenker Inc. (P&G - Iowa City)'s TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.3 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Iowa City, IA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/102
  • PHOTO Nice-Pak Customer Fu…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nice-Pak Customer Fullfillment Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Schenker Inc. (P&G - Iowa City) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schenker Inc. (P&G - Iowa City) averages 0.8 TCR (14% of the Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schenker Inc. (P&G - Iowa City) TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Schenker Inc. (P&G - Iowa City) falls in its industry

9,477 Warehousing and storage, gener establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 102 Warehousing and storage, gener employers in Iowa.

Schenker Inc. (P&G - Iowa City) (65 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Schenker Inc. (P&G - Iowa City)
Schenker Inc. (P&G - Iowa City) (65 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Schenker Inc. (P&G - Iowa City) has fewer employees than the Warehousing and storage, general merchan median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2016 1.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · IA · Iowa City

9,477 Warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 131 employers in Iowa City, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nice-Pak Customer Fullfillment Center 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sika Canton 225 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Groveport PPE 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - PDK2 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE PDA Duane Arnold 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dubuque Operating Center 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forrest and Associate Inc 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cedar Rapids, IA/Quad Cities HVAC 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1918-19187610 29,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Iowa City North Dodge (ICND) 940 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8010516-P and G Iowa City 772 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Iowa City 721 FTE
NAT-TCR Community Support Center 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Swg Corporate Headquarters 0091-Fac20 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Environmental Pest Service Holdings, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Community Campus 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE PDQ Door Co., Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fse Wtc 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 0368 WILSON 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2636-PENNSYLVANIA.ALLENTOWN 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.