General warehousing and storage · Illinois

Schenker Inc. (Royal Canin - Edwardsville)

Edwardsville, IL · ~85 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schenker Inc. (Royal Canin - Edwardsville) runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Schenker Inc. (Royal Canin - Edwardsville): 1.1 TCR = 19% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schenker Inc. (Royal Canin - Edwardsville) safety composite

Schenker Inc. (Royal Canin - Edwardsville) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Schenker Inc. (Royal Canin - Edwardsville): 0.0 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.78× in 2020

Schenker Inc. (Royal Canin - Edwardsville)'s TCR rose 1.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Edwardsville, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #69/551
  • PHOTO Electrolux, NPOC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Electrolux, NPOC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Schenker Inc. (Royal Canin - Edwardsville) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schenker Inc. (Royal Canin - Edwardsville) averages 1.1 TCR (19% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schenker Inc. (Royal Canin - Edwardsville) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=2 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.8 · BLS 5.8

Where Schenker Inc. (Royal Canin - Edwardsville) falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 551 General warehousing and storag employers in Illinois.

Schenker Inc. (Royal Canin - Edwardsville) (85 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Schenker Inc. (Royal Canin - Edwardsville)
Schenker Inc. (Royal Canin - Edwardsville) (85 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Schenker Inc. (Royal Canin - Edwardsville) has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.8 0.9 2 0 0
2019 1.8 0.0 2 0 0
2018 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · IL · Edwardsville

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 105 employers in Edwardsville, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Electrolux, NPOC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR WSC SAFB Commissary 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR IL - UTAS 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR US CA Moreno Valley DSC 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Atkinson 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Utica UTI1 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monmouth, IL 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newton Power Station 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAIC2 1,167 FTE
CITY-NEAR J.F. Electric, Incorporated 989 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : STL4 905 FTE
CITY-NEAR Madison County Government 886 FTE
NAT-TCR Filtration : Washington EMOE 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mesquite Country Enterprises LP 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MKS Longmont 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 702 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 399R 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vimco.250 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oak Creek Youth Correctional Facility 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Stoneworks 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.